Let's take a look. Here's the Husky Nation logo.

This logo has complimentary colors, easy to read text, and something that closely ties it to the University of Washington community. It isn't a complex logo, and isn't very ambitious, but it is functional and gets the job done. All in all, it's a pretty good logo.
Now, here's the One Campus logo.
The One Campus logo ties in well with the political marketing

EDIT: I would also like to bring up that this logo is very generic. It isn't tied to the UW, this year, or anything in specific. This logo could be for any campaign on any campus. For that matter, it could be used on all three UW campuses by a coalition ticket that is trying to run a united UW student government.
Team Legacy has produced a rather bland logo.


Vote Big's logo obviously reflects that their ticket is just the two of them, Chris and Shauna, but is still very appealing. The solid background with the white outlined characters and the handwritten-style names. It's an appealing logo. That said, it does not tie in to this year or the UW/ASUW, aside from the use of a yellowy-orange that could be taken as "gold." It's a pretty good logo in general, but not an excellent choice for this campaign.
I support One Campus, but I just had to mention that I like the Legacy logo. The classic columns/pillars are also a symbol of our university (sylvan garden? UW crest/logo?) I agree the color scheme could change, but I believe it's tied to UW with the column.
ReplyDelete