Sunday, April 18, 2010

Organization Relations


This position is the Board position with which I am most familiar. Its primary role is to assist the four entities/organizations in achieving their goals and missions by relating their needs to the Board of Directors and by providing some oversight to those same entities from the Board level. I've worked under two Directors of Org Relations, and watched a third closely, because of my time working in the Experimental College, the largest of the four entities. The remaining three are Off Campus Housing Affairs, Rainy Dawg Radio, and the ASUW Bike Shop.

Candidates: Rory Raabe (Husky Nation), Jonathan Yan (One Campus), and Nick Booher (Team Legacy).

Current Positions: Rory is currently the Assistant Manager for Rainy Dawg Radio, which means she has had to work closely with the current Director of Org Relations, which means she has a clear leg up in understanding the position and its duties. Her experience at Hollow Earth Radio shows she has a clear passion for the work done by Rainy Dawg, which should translate well into work as Org Relations.

Jonathan is currently serving as Tunny Vann's "associate Director" of Community Relations. The position's duties seem to be assisting the Director in all they do. He is also an ASUW Senator, an IFC representative, and an accounting and marketing major.

Nick currently serves as a supervisor in the Housing and Food Services owned and operated McMahon Hall Nook.

Strengths: Jonathan's strengths include that he has some experience working within the ASUW, both as Tunny's Assoc. Director and as a Senator, and his connections within the Greek community. His majors in accounting and marketing could also be useful.

Nick has experience working within an organization that is primarily student run, so he can relate with the work done by the entities. His previous experiences on campaigns will also be useful during their race for the Board.

Rory is a very strong candidate for this position due to her current position in one of the four entities and the constant contact with the current Director of Org Relations. She knows one of the entities intimately, and has had contact with the current directors of the other entities.

Weaknesses: Nick is weak in that he does not have much demonstrated leadership experience or much experience with ASUW. He will need to show that he can learn the ins and outs of the position while also fulfilling the needs of the entities.

Rory's weakness is that she is a much quieter personality than other campaigners and has an apparently smaller support base (as evidenced by the number of fans on her campaign page). Support can be grown, and with some effort and coaching, a quiet person can come out of their shell.

Jonathan's weakness, as I've made no bones about so far, is that he has precious little experience with the position or duties of Organization Relations. His platform is honestly a very bare bones approach to Organization Relations. He suggests implementing new, and enhancing existing, financial systems, but after speaking with a few people currently serving in the entities, I've not heard he's spoken with any of them about their current systems. It seems quite presumptuous to assume the need to change systems without finding out what the entities think about their own systems. His other positions are mostly fluff. A high def station for Rainy Dawg is not a new idea, nor is using social media and new tech to strengthen the customer relationship... in fact, the Experimental College has been doing so for at least the last three years (to greater or lesser efficacy depending on the current Public Relations person). Were I Jonathan, I would take time to go speak with the current Directors, Assistant Directors, Managers and Assistant Managers in the four entities to find out what their goals and needs are, as well as what they think their challenges are, and then update my platform accordingly.

EDIT: When I say "his other positions are mostly fluff..." I mean the positions on his platform, not other positions he has held in other organizations. I thought that was clear in the context of the sentences around it, but after receiving a question on that point I wanted to clarify.

7 comments:

  1. I'd like to point out not a one of them has any real experience with any part of the position, and as such, they don't really know a thing. All of them seemingly exist for ticket balance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Working for Rainy Dawg is, by definition, experience related to the position.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Fair enough, but it's a smaller slice and much more insular than say...Exco or having been on STF, or F&B.

    That brush was more meant for the other two. My problem with slates is the following: they pick someone for the job that is for "ticket balance" (other than Natalie, every person I've known who's held the job have been Greek) not on competence.

    It's usually the last one filled, and few people want it other than as a means to get on the BOD.

    Scott Robinson was the exception to the rule, he actually sought out the job, and in it he was enthusiastic and very talented in the role.

    Now, Cullen White was good enough at the job, but he wanted on the BOD, and Org Relations was his way on.

    Rachel Flynn, utterly useless, point of fact, she tried to get rid of it.

    Natalie Bankson, as much as I like her personally, was mostly ineffectual in her job,

    Rachel Hollcraft, holy shit was she craptastically bad.

    Maggie Bennett was a last minute replacement and hasn't worked out badly, but being sorority sisters with the Madeleine and being in UW Leaders certainly don't spell out competence in the role (those two things being the fundamental basis of why she was recruited) once Jono was unable to run.

    The ideal candidate for the position is in fact Jono, or especially Neil Rotta (which is funny because he wasn't put on a slate, and he's the most qualified guy on campus for the job...then again, he's not Greek), someone who has been internal to the ASUW, been around for a while, and knows the parts of the job.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Everett, most of your points I won't argue because they're opinion and change from person to person, but I will say that Rachel Hollcraft was not "craptastically bad."

    I worked closely with Rachel when she was Org Rel because I was the Assistant Director in the Experimental College. She helped us effectively reach out to the UW administration on multiple occasions and was always there to support the needs of the Experimental College.

    I can't speak for how she performed her job in the other roles of her position, but she worked extremely hard, and well, for ExCo.

    I will agree that Neil would have been the ideal candidate, but he didn't end up on any of the tickets.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well, my dealings with her were regarding STF and F&B, and in those she was craptastically bad.

    And yeah, I'm pissed that this gets treated as the throw away position used to get a Greek on the board, especially with how important it actually is.

    ReplyDelete